Motion

Submitted by jhwierenga on Mon, 07/30/2018 - 07:55

The invariant sum of the speed of an object through space and time is due to a resonance between space and time.

Phenomenon explained :

"General Relativity describes motion accurately". The combined experienced speed of an object through space and time is equal to the experienced speed of light, as perceived by an observer. An object that moves through space at the experienced speed of light does not move at all in experienced time. An object that is fully in time does not move at all in space. In this sense, time and the spatial dimensions are equivalent.

In QO, the invariant sum of the speed of a object through space and time is explained by the time dilation effect of tensions along the edges between space quanta. The more rapid the motion along an edge, the greater the time dilation. In this way, the behavior predicted by General Relativity is accounted for.  For the same reasons, the speed of light will appear to be the same in all directions, for any object, regardless of its motion.

The QO explanation for General Relativity is founded on the QO concept that independent concepts can resonate together to produce invariant behavior. The equivalence of time and space is not an indication that they are fundamentally the same thing, any more than the equation eiπ + 1 = 0 implies that e, i, pi, 1 and 0 are the fundamentally the same thing. They are interconnected, as explained in the lemma on Euler's jewel. Time and space came into existence independently, and subsequently resonated to produce the invariant behavior which General Relativity helps us to understand.

Credibility:

This explanation involves a gap, due to the absence of a mathematical formulation. The gap involves time and space in conjunction, making the gap complex, with an Occam Score of 0300. However, there is no competing explanation which is better. General Relativity has similarly credible statements as to the why, and covers the what better, but does not deal with the how. Accordingly, this explanation is tentatively credible.